Comments for Spurious Tuples

Comment on in which I date myself, and also crack myself up by website design Philadelphia

website design Philadelphia — Sat, 04 May 2013 22:18:14 +0000

My brother recommended I would possibly like this web site. He was once totally right. This publish truly made my day. You can not consider simply how a lot time I had spent for this info! Thank you!

Comment on The No-Demonstration Class, Or, Not by Jehrsdfd

Jehrsdfd — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:13:27 +0000

I didn’t go to university http://community.parents.com/asumouooi/blog/2013/04/04/lolita_kingdom_nude_pics russian pedo loli topvagina This dude is gross with all the spittin and dirty feet suckin. Yuck! It would have been good if he wasnt so nasty. and ugly. LOL

Comment on The No-Demonstration Class, Or, Not by Woobhlsk

Woobhlsk — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:13:25 +0000

Wonderfull great site lolita's tight sweet cunt The acting is horrible and the sex is sub par but all three of these women are super hot. Does anyone know the names of the two brunettes or the title of the movie?

Comment on The No-Demonstration Class, Or, Not by Ejlmvyso

Ejlmvyso — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:02:23 +0000

Jonny was here pornstargals my pussy is so fucking wet i came twice fuck!

Comment on Some new things I tried this semester, part 1: The workshop class by rudy

rudy — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:39:27 +0000

Catherine, thanks for sharing this! I’m inspired now to start thinking differently about my ENG 102 sessions in the spring. I’m not sure I have the relationships yet to have the profs require the class to do pre-work, but I might try it in a handful of classes and see hwo well it goes!

I’m curious what kind of platonic ideals/imperfections you were hoping would appear?

Comment on Some new things I tried this semester, Part 2: Summative assessment by Kaijsa

Kaijsa — Sat, 22 Dec 2012 04:56:21 +0000

I did a citation analysis with a colleague using bibliographies divorced from the papers, and it really is fascinating to evaluate them. What we did was create a rubric and score them based on 3-4 criteria. It was interesting to see how many students used one resource (a database), what kinds of sources they chose, etc. This was after instruction, so we knew what we showed them to do. It was also interesting to compare one section of the class to another, and there were clear differences that we posited were somewhat related to the course instruction, ie did they actually show up with a topic, an RQ, a clue of any sort.

Comment on RUSQ, Open Access, and Me by Curiouser and Curiouser: What caught our eyes online this week | Chasing Reference

Fri, 18 May 2012 12:10:56 +0000

[...] Readers and contributors to RUSQ debate the journal’s Open Access policy. [...]

Comment on RUSQ, Open Access, and Me by walt crawford

walt crawford — Sat, 12 May 2012 16:50:55 +0000

Steve's right, of course: Using a CC license (not an issue with RUSQ anyway) means you can't retroactively restrict access; it doesn't require you to actively provide the online means.

Comment on RUSQ, Open Access, and Me by Vardibidian

Vardibidian — Fri, 11 May 2012 17:29:20 +0000

Thank you for writing this up—as a non-librarian working in a library, I miss a lot of this sort of thing.

As my employer seems to be heading toward getting rid of most of the print journals on-site and leaning much more heavily on access to digital materials, I have been very much concerned about this kind of thing. In fact, I’ve been a trifle Cassandra-ish about telling people that materials that are available now may not be available in ten years, for a variety of more or less probable reasons I can imagine.

I suppose, as these sorts of things do happen, and if people know about these sorts of things happening (including in journals outside their academic fields, one hopes), there will be less confusion and quicker resolution as patterns are identified. The middle part sure can get ugly, though.

Thanks,
-V.

Comment on RUSQ, Open Access, and Me by Catherine

Catherine — Fri, 11 May 2012 17:11:57 +0000

Thanks, Walt, for that clarification. I should have mentioned that unless the author retains copyright and chooses to apply a CC license, that situation doesn’t apply to RUSQ. Authors either have the option to sign copyright over to ALA, or to retain copyright and license the work to ALA for distribution via RUSQ, but there’s no default CC license applied.